The entries slowed, sidelined by work, deals concluding and discontinued, a zany hailstorm of activity. That, and I took a vacation.
Family, neighbors, and clients voiced concern, "you need to get away, your work is devouring you, go somewhere, decompress."
"Where," I asked, "Cleveland's on my wish list, but the Museum of Art is closed till late June."
"Maui, St. Thomas, Cancun," suggestions fired like a Hubbell heater, each a bit more desperate and thoughtful.

"Near water," I puzzled.
"Yes, " they implored.
"Maybe a river," I continued.
"That'll do," sounded the chorus.
"The Mississippi River, " I concluded, "the Twin Cities."
So off I went, armed with Larry Millet's AIA guidebook to the architecture of Minneapolis-St. Paul, hoping to learn more about the city's great builders, the original starchitects, like Cass Gilbert, Clarence Johnston, Harry Jones, and the Prairie School poobahs Elmslie & Purcell.
Instead, I realized that American cities are almost all the same. (No bad

thing, with something in each to love.) So many cities underwent tremendous growth in the 1880's, shedding absolutely their small-town forms, force fed by industrial advances, and burgeoning transportation networks. In 1920's another boom time facilitated downtown growth, great apartment houses, and a continued outward push. Periods of war are marked by inactivity in the built environment. PWA Moderne projects typify the 1930's (except notably in Los Angeles). In the 1950's and '60's,

downtowns and main streets are decimated by large land clearing projects, freeways, and pedestrian malls, as civic leaders respond desperately to suburban dispersal and fading influence. In the early 21st century, high density in-fill (and adaptive re-use) pockmark re-imagined city centers with "luxury" condos, townhouses, and artist lofts. Under the cover of smart-growth mantras, most puncture the sensitive integument of scale and mass.
END PART 1
Labels: Other Places